Disability and Health Journal
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 14-24, January 2008

The changing profile of disability in the U.S. Army: 1981-2005

  • Nicole S. Bell, Sc.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Social Sectors Development Strategies, Inc., Boston, MA 02118, USA
    • Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA
  • ,
  • Carolyn E. Schwartz, Sc.D.

      Affiliations

    • Social Sectors Development Strategies, Inc., Boston, MA 02118, USA
    • DeltaQuest Foundation, Concord, MA 01742, USA
    • Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
  • ,
  • Thomas Harford, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA
  • ,
  • Ilyssa E. Hollander, M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Social Sectors Development Strategies, Inc., Boston, MA 02118, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: 1411 Washington Street, Suite 6, Boston, MA 02118. Fax: 508-233-4887.
  • ,
  • Paul J. Amoroso, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Investigation, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA
    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

Abstract 

Background

We sought to provide a profile of U.S. Army soldiers discharged with a permanent disability and to clarify whether underlying demographic changes explain increasing risks.

Methods

Frequency distributions and logistic regression analyses describe active-duty Army soldiers discharged with a disability (January 1981 through December 2005; N = 108,119). Time-series analysis describes temporal changes in demographic factors associated with disability.

Results

Disability risk has increased 7-fold over the past 25 years. In 2005, there were 1,262 disability discharges per 100,000 active-duty soldiers. Risk factors include female gender, lower rank, married or formerly married, high school education or less, and age 40 or younger. Army population demographics changed during this time; the average age and tenure of soldiers increased, and the proportion of soldiers who were officers, women, and college educated grew. Adjusting for these demographic changes did not explain the rapidly increasing risk of disability. Time-series models revealed that disability among women is increasing independently of the increasing number of women in the Army; disability is also increasing at a faster pace for younger, lower-ranked, enlisted, and shorter-tenured soldiers.

Conclusion

Disability is costly and growing in the Army. Temporal changes in underlying Army population demographics do not explain overall disability increases. Disability is increasing most rapidly among female, junior enlisted, and younger soldiers.

Keywords: Disability, Army, Musculoskeletal, Injury, TAIHOD, VASRD

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 We can think of no conflicts of interest that might bias our work. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Army.

PII: S1936-6574(07)00009-X

doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2007.11.007

Disability and Health Journal
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 14-24, January 2008