Disability and Health Journal
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 104-109, April 2009

Psychosocial predictors of physical activity and health-related quality of life among adults with physical disabilities: An integrative framework

  • Maria Kosma, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: 112 H.P. Long Fieldhouse. Fax: (225) 578-3680.
  • ,
  • Rebecca Ellis, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology and Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA
  • ,
  • Bradley J. Cardinal, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
  • ,
  • Jeremy J. Bauer, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
  • ,
  • Jeffrey A. McCubbin, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA

Abstract 

Background

People with disabilities report lower physical activity (PA) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) levels than people without disabilities. Therefore, it is important to identify factors that motivate individuals with disabilities to be physically active and thus increase their HRQOL.

Objectives

The purpose of the study was to prospectively explore the effects of past theory of planned behavior (TPB) constructs on future (6-month) HRQOL (physical and mental health) through past stages of change (SOC) and future (6-month) PA among adults with physical disabilities. Two models were tested whereby the SOC and PA served as the mediators between the TPB constructs, physical health (PH-Model), and mental health (MH-Model). It was hypothesized that both models would fit the sample data.

Methods

Participants were 141 adults with physical disabilities (mean age = 46.04, females = 70.9%). The online survey was completed at two different time periods. First, the TPB constructs and SOC were assessed using self-report standardized questionnaires. Six months later, participants completed standardized self-report scales about their PA and HRQOL levels. Using LISREL 8, two path analyses were conducted to examine the two study models (PH-Model and MH-Model).

Results

Based on the two path analyses, attitude had the highest effect on SOC followed by perceived behavioral control within both well-fit models. The PH-Model explained more variance in PA (26%) and physical health (55%) than the MH-Model.

Conclusions

Health promoters should reinforce both positive intentions and behavioral experiences to increase PA and HRQOL among adults with physical disabilities.

Keywords: Theory of planned behavior, Stages of change, Online prospective survey, Physical and mental health

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to declare.

PII: S1936-6574(08)00157-X

doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.10.062

Disability and Health Journal
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 104-109, April 2009