Disability and Health Journal
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 77-85 , April 2009

Perspectives on use of mobility aids in a diverse population of seniors: Implications for intervention

  • Linda Resnik, P.T., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • aProvidence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI 02908, USA
    • bDepartment of Community Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: 2 Stimson Avenue. Fax: (401) 863-3489.
    • ,
  • Susan Allen, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • bDepartment of Community Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
    • ,
  • Deborah Isenstadt, M.B.A.

      Affiliations

    • cAbt Associates, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
    • ,
  • Melanie Wasserman, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • cAbt Associates, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
    • ,
  • Lisa Iezzoni, M.D., M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • dHarvard University and Institute for Health Policy, Boston, MA 02114, USA
    • eBeth Israel University Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA

References 

  1. Nandapalan V, Smith CA, Jones AS, Lesser TH. Objective measurement of the benefit of walking sticks in peripheral vestibular balance disorders, using the Sway Weigh balance platform. J Laryngol Otol. 1995;109(9):836–840
  2. Smith R, Quine S, Anderson J, Black K. Assistive devices: self-reported use by older people in Victoria. Aust Health Rev. 2002;25(4):169–177
  3. Allen SM, Foster A, Berg K. Receiving help at home: the interplay of human and technological assistance. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56(6):S374–S382
  4. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(1):1–14
  5. Ostchega Y, Harris TB, Hirsch R, Parsons VL, Kington R. The prevalence of functional limitations and disability in older persons in the US: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(9):1132–1135
  6. Kaye S, Kang T, LaPlante MP. Mobility Device Use in the United States. San Francisco, CA: Disability Statistics Center; 2000;
  7. Cornman JC, Freedman VA. Racial and ethnic disparities in mobility device use in late life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008;63(1):S34–S41
  8. Melzer D, Lan TY, Tom BD, Deeg DJ, Guralnik JM. Variation in thresholds for reporting mobility disability between national population subgroups and studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(12):1295–1303
  9. Kronlof Haggblom G, Sonn U. Elderly women's way of relating to assistive devices. Technol Disabil. 1999;10:161–168
  10. McMillen A, Soderberg S. Disabled persons' experience of dependence on assistive devices. Scand J Occup Therapy. 2002;9:176–183
  11. Petterson I, Appelrosk P, Alhlstrom G. Lifeworld perspectives utilizing assistive devices: Individuals, lived experience following a stroke. Can J Occup Therapy. 2007;74(1):15–75
  12. Roelands M, Van Oost P, Depoorter A, Buysse A. A social-cognitive model to predict the use of assistive devices for mobility and self-care in elderly people. Gerontologist. 2002;42(1):39–50
  13. Pippin K, Fernie G. Designing devices that are acceptable to the frail elderly: a new understanding based upon how older people perceive a walker. Technol Disabil. 1997;7:93–102
  14. Gitlin LN, Luborsky MR, Schemm RL. Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. Gerontologist. 1998;38(2):169–180
  15. Aminzadeh F, Edwards N. Exploring seniors' views on the use of assistive devices in fall prevention. Public Health Nurs. 1998;15(4):297–304
  16. Copolillo A. Use of mobility devices: the decision-making process of nine African-American older adults. Occup Ther J Res. 2001;21(3):185–200
  17. Iezzoni LI. When Walking Fails: Mobility Problems of Adults With Chronic Conditions. Berkeley/New York: University of California Press Millbank Memorial Fund; 2003;
  18. Luborsky MR. Sociological factors shaping adaptive technology usage: fulfilling the promise. Technol Disabil. 1993;2(1):71–78
  19. Bender DE, Harbour C, Thorp J, Morris P. Tell me what you mean by “si”: perceptions of quality of prenatal care among immigrant Latina women. Qual Health Res. 2001;11(6):780–794
  20. Benton D. Grounded theory. In:  Cormack D editors. The Research Process in Nursing. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science; 1993;
  21. Morgan D. Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qual Health Res. 1993;(1):3
  22. Wong R, Higgins M. Dynamics of intergeneral assistance in middle and old-age in Mexico. In:  Angel JL,  Whitfield KE editor. The Health of Aging Hispanics: The Mexican-Origin Population. New York, NY: Springer; 2007;p. 99–120
  23. Rogler L, et al. Hispanic Mental Health: A Framework for Reach. Malabar, FL: Krieger; 1989;

 This research was supported by R03 AG025094-01, a grant from the National Institute on Aging.

PII: S1936-6574(09)00002-8

doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.12.002

Disability and Health Journal
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 77-85 , April 2009

Article Tools