Disability and Health Journal
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 49-56 , April 2009

The dilemma of measuring perceived health status in the context of disability

  • Gloria L. Krahn, Ph.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: 1600 Clifton Road. Fax: (404) 498-3060.
    • ,
  • Glenn Fujiura, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago IL 60612, USA
    • ,
  • Charles E. Drum, J.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA
    • ,
  • Bradley J. Cardinal, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA
    • ,
  • Margaret A. Nosek, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
    • ,
  • the RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement

References 

  1. Marge M. Health promotion for persons with disabilities: moving beyond rehabilitation. Am J Health Prom. 1988;2:29–35
  2. USDHHS. Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2001;
  3. USDHHS. Closing the Gap: A National Blueprint to Improve the Health of Persons With Mental Retardation. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002;
  4. USDHHS. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Improve the Health and Wellness of Persons With Disabilities. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2005;
  5. Cott CA, Gignac MA, Badley EM. Determinants of self rated health for Canadians with chronic disease and disability. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:731–736
  6. Gorman BK, Sivaganesan A. The role of social support and integration for understanding socioeconomic disparities in self-rated health and hypertension. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:958–975
  7. Hall T. Review of existing measures. State of the Science: Health, Wellness and Disability; May 9; Portland, OR; 2008.
  8. WHO . International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001;
  9. Albrecht GL, Devlieger PJ. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:977–988
  10. Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ. 2002;234:1417–1421
  11. McHorney CA. Health status assessment methods for adults: past accomplishments and future challenges. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:309–335
  12. CDC . Measuring Healthy Days. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2000;
  13. Yost KJ, Haan MN, Levine RA, Gold EB. Comparing SF-36 scores across three groups of women with different health profiles. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1251–1261
  14. Moriarty DG, Kobau R, Zack MM, Zahran HS. Tracking healthy days: a window on the health of older adults. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2:A16
  15. Abada T, Hou F, Ram B. Racially mixed neighborhoods, perceived neighborhood social cohesion, and adolescent health in Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:2004–2017
  16. Bzostek S, Goldman N, Pebley A. Why do Hispanics in the USA report poor health?. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:990–1003
  17. Drum CE, Horner-Johnson W, Krahn GL. Self-rated health and healthy days: examining the “disability paradox”. Disabil Health J. 2008;1:71–78
  18. Hughes RB, Robinson-Whelen S, Taylor HB, Hall JW. Stress self-management: an intervention for women with physical disabilities. Women's Health Issues. 2006;16:389–399
  19. Nosek MA, Simmons DK. People with disabilities as a health disparities population: the case of sexual and reproductive health disparities. Calif J Health Prom. 2007;5:68–81
  20. Drum CE, Krahn G, Culley C, et al. Recognizing and responding to the health disparities of people with disabilities. Calif J Health Prom. 2005;3:29–42
  21. Heidrich J, Liese AD, Lowel H, Keil U. Self-rated health and its relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in Southern Germany. Results from the MONICA Augsburg Cohort Study 1984–1995. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:338–345
  22. Idler EL, Russell LB, Davis D. Survival, functional limitations, and self-rated health in the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study, 1992. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:873–874
  23. Abdullah N, Horner-Johnson W, Drum CE, et al. Healthy lifestyles for people with disabilities. Calif J Health Prom. 2004;2:41–53
  24. Ravesloot C, Seekins T, White G. Living well with a disability health promotion intervention: improved health status for consumers and lower costs for health care policymakers. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:239–245
  25. Idler E, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38:21–37
  26. Andresen EM, Meyers AR. Health-related quality of life outcomes measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:30–45
  27. Majani G, Giardini A, Scotti A. Subjective impact of osteoarthritis flare-ups on patients’ quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:14
  28. Patrick DL, Chiang Y-P. Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Med Care. 2000;38:II14–II25
  29. Huguet N, Kaplan MS, Feeny D. Socioeconomic status and health-related quality of life among elderly people: Results from the Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:803–810
  30. Maddigan SL, Feeny DH, Majumdar SR, Farris KB, Johnson JA. Understanding the determinants of health for people with type 2 diabetes. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:1649–1655
  31. Sun J. Adjusting distributions of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 utility scores of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:11–20
  32. Helmes E. Function and disability or quality of life? Issues illustrated by the Osteoporosis Functional Disability Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:755–761
  33. Johnson RJ, Wolinsky FD. The structure of health status among older adults: disease, disability, functional limitation and perceived health. J Health Soc Behav. 1993;34:105–121
  34. Hoeymans N, Feskens EJ, van den Bos GA, Kromhout D. Measuring functional status: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between performance and self-report (Zutphen Elderly Study 1990-1993). J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1103–1110
  35. Sullivan MD, Kempen GI, Van Sonderen E, Ormel J. Models of health-related quality of life in a population of community-dwelling Dutch elderly. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:801–810
  36. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, Inc.; 2000;
  37. Meyers AR, Andresen EM, Hagglund KJ. A model of outcomes research: spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:S81–S90
  38. Luther SL, Kromrey J, Powell-Cope G, et al. A pilot study to modify the SF-36V physical functioning scale for use with veterans with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1059–1066
  39. Meyers AR, Andresen EM. Enabling our instruments: accommodation, universal design, and access to participation in research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:S5–S9
  40. Tate DG, Kalpakjian CZ, Forchheimer MB. Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:S18–S25
  41. Dudley-Javoroski S, Shields RK. Assessment of physical function and secondary complications after complete spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:103–110
  42. Krahn G, Suzuki R, Horner-Johnson W. Relationships among measures of self-reported health in persons with spinal cord injury. 136th Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association; October 25-29; San Diego, CA; 2008.
  43. Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Carande-Kulis V, et al. Measuring the public's health. Public Health Rep. 2006;121:14–22
  44. Aday LA, Fleming GV, Andersen R. Access to Medical Care in the U.S.: Who Has It, Who Doesn't. Chicago, IL: Pluribus Press; 1984;
  45. Andersen RM. Behavioral Model of Families’ Use Oo Health Services. Research Series No. 25. Chicago, IL: Center for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago; 1968;
  46. Idler EL, Hudson SV, Leventhal H. The meanings of self-ratings of health: a qualitative and quantitative approach. Res Aging. 1999;21:458–476
  47. Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, Oja P, Pasanen M, Urponen H. Self-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:517–528
  48. Wolinsky FD, Arnold CL. A different perspective on health and health services utilization. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 1988;8:71–101
  49. Bjorner JB, Ware JE, Kosinski M. The potential synergy between cognitive models and modern psychometric models. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:261–274
  50. Jobe JB. Cognitive psychology and self-reports: models and methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:219–227
  51. Schechter S, Herrmann D. The proper use of self-report questions in effective measurement of health outcomes. Eval Health Prof. 1997;20:28–46
  52. Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwarz N. Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1996;
  53. Tourangeau R. Cognitive science and survey methods. In:  Jabine T,  Straf M,  Tanur J,  Tourangeau R editor. Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1984;p. 73–100
  54. Rapkin BD, Schwartz CE. Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:14
  55. Schwartz CE, Rapkin BD. Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:16
  56. Krause NM, Jay GM. What do global self-rated health items measure?. Med Care. 1994;32:930–942
  57. Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Jepson C. Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:599–607
  58. Finlay WM, Lyons E. Methodological issues in interviewing and using self-report questionnaires with people with mental retardation. Psychol Assess. 2001;13:319–335
  59. Heal LW, Sigelman CK. Methodological issues in measuring the quality of life of individuals with mental retardation. In:  Schalock RL editors. Quality of Life: Perspectives and Issues. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation; 1990;p. 161–176
  60. Sigelman CK, Budd EC, Spanhel CL, Schoenrock CJ. When in doubt, say yes: Acquiescence in interviews with mentally retarded persons. Ment Retard. 1981;19:53–58
  61. Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, et al. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Therap. 1996;18:979–992
  62. Froelich-Grobe K, Andresen EM, Caburnay C, Roberts J, White G. Measuring health-related quality of life for persons with physical disabilities: an enabled version of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36E). Qual Life Res. 2008;17:751–770
  63. Mitra M, Chung M, Wilber N, Klein Walker D. Smoking status and quality of life: a longitudinal study among adults with disabilities. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:258–260
  64. Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1225–1237
  65. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–592

 The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to declare.

PII: S1936-6574(09)00003-X

doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.12.003

Disability and Health Journal
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 49-56 , April 2009

Article Tools