Disability and Health Journal
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 180-187, October 2009

Continuity in provider and site of care and preventive services receipt in an adult Medicaid population with physical disabilities

  • Susan M. Allen, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Box G-121-6. Fax: (401) 863-3489.
  • ,
  • Susan Wieland, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
  • ,
  • Jane Griffin, M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Rhode Island Medicaid Research and Evaluation Project, Cranston, RI 02920, USA
  • ,
  • Pedro Gozalo, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA

Abstract 

Background

This study investigated the relationship between continuity of care (having one's own doctor and a regular site of care), and receipt of preventive services in a population of adult fee-for-service Medicaid enrollees with physical disabilities.

Methods

A random sample of 555 physically disabled Rhode Island Medicaid enrollees aged 18 to 64 years were surveyed by telephone. Respondents were asked about receipt of six preventive services in the previous year. They were also asked whether they had their own doctor and whether they had a regular site of care. Regression analyses with propensity score corrections for selection bias were used to test the associations between care continuity measures and the number of preventive services received, as well as the receipt of each individual service.

Results

After adjustment for predisposing, enabling, and need factors, respondents with their own doctor received 0.73 more preventive services than peers without their own doctor, and respondents who had a usual site of care received 0.85 more services than peers who received care at the emergency department or who had no regular site. The influences of having a regular doctor and a usual site of care varied according to type of preventive service, and these influences appear to be largely complementary rather than overlapping.

Conclusions

Study findings suggest that care models for adults with physical disabilities should include mechanisms to ensure both physician and site continuity. A strong primary care component that links individual patients with a personal doctor, as well as care protocols that ensure receipt of preventive services, appear to be optimal for medically needy populations.

Keywords: Preventive health services, continuity of care, Medicaid, disability

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Financial disclosure: This research was supported in part by a Rhode Island Medicaid Program Fellowship under a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

 Dr. Allen has served as a consultant to the RI Medicaid program and as principal investigator on contracts to Brown University to conduct research on Medicaid populations. Ms. Griffin has conducted research and evaluation projects under contract to the RI Medicaid program, or through subcontracts to one of the program's contractors. Dr. Wieland has not had affiliations or employment within the last 2 years relevant to the subject matter of the manuscript, and Dr. Gonzalo has not had affiliations or employment related to the Medicaid program. We do not perceive that any authors possess any conflict of interest in submitting this manuscript for publication.

PII: S1936-6574(09)00065-X

doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.06.004

Disability and Health Journal
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 180-187, October 2009