Journal Home
Search for

Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 133-145 (July 2010)


View previous. 5 of 14 View next.

Benefits of wellness interventions for persons with chronic and disabling conditions: A review of the evidence

Alexa K. Stuifbergen, Ph.D., R.N., F.A.A.N.Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Marian Morris, M.P.H., Jae Hak Jung, M.A., Diana Pierini, B.S.N., R.N., Stephanie Morgan, M.S.N., F.N.P.-B.C.

published online 11 December 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Persons living with the effects of chronic and disabling conditions are often at increased risk for the development of secondary conditions and disabilities that can lead to further decline in health status, independence, functional status, life satisfaction, and overall quality of life.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to review the evidence for the benefits of wellness/health promotion interventions for persons with chronic and disabling conditions.

Methods

The authors conducted a Medline search (1990-2007) using terms related to wellness and health promotion cross-referenced with general terms for chronic and disabling conditions, as well as 15 specific chronic and/or disabling conditions (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury). Selection of studies was limited to those published in English that reported randomized controlled trails or prospective studies that involved adult human subjects with a chronic and/or disabling condition. All selected studies focused on some aspect of a wellness or health promotion intervention and involved a comparison or control group. Of the 5,847 studies initially identified in the search using medical subject heading terms, 190 met the criteria for full review. Data were extracted from these publications and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results

Almost all studies (95%) explored the effects of wellness intervention in a sample diagnosed with a single condition (e.g., cancer, stroke, arthritis). Although the mean sample size was 100, the range in sample size varied widely (6-688); 25% of the studies had sample of 30 or fewer. Almost all studies (89.5%) reported positive effects of the wellness intervention, although the delivery and content of interventions as well as the measurement of outcomes, varied greatly.

Conclusions

Our findings support an immediate post-intervention positive impact of wellness interventions across persons with a wide variety of chronic and disabling conditions. Future research that clearly specifies primary study outcomes and follows the CONSORT guidelines will strengthen future reviews of the evidence and facilitate application of the evidence of practice.

Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research in Underserved Populations, The University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, Austin, TX 78701 USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: 1700 Red River. Fax: (512) 475-8755.

 Financial disclosure: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research grants P30NR005051 and R01NR003195. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Nursing Research or the National Institutes of Health. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

PII: S1936-6574(09)00191-5

doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.10.007


View previous. 5 of 14 View next.