<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/?rss=yes"><title>Disability and Health Journal</title><description>Disability and Health Journal RSS feed: Current Issue. 
 Disability and Health Journal   is a scientific, scholarly and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions 
that advance knowledge in disability and health. Such contributions include reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons 
with disabilities, environments, health outcomes, and determinants of health; systematic reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations 
of research literatures; and evaluative research on new interventions, technologies and programs. The focus will be public health, health 
promotion, health education, wellness and prevention, reducing the incidence of secondary conditions and medical conditions.

</description><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>1936-6574</prism:issn><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:publicationDate>July 2010</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001915/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409000697/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001939/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001952/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001940/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001885/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001927/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409002118/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001897/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000026/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000403/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000415/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000427/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000439/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001915/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Benefits of wellness interventions for persons with chronic and disabling conditions: A review of the evidence</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001915/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: Persons living with the effects of chronic and disabling conditions are often at increased risk for the development of secondary conditions and disabilities that can lead to further decline in health status, independence, functional status, life satisfaction, and overall quality of life.Objective: The purpose of this study was to review the evidence for the benefits of wellness/health promotion interventions for persons with chronic and disabling conditions.Methods: The authors conducted a Medline search (1990-2007) using terms related to wellness and health promotion cross-referenced with general terms for chronic and disabling conditions, as well as 15 specific chronic and/or disabling conditions (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury). Selection of studies was limited to those published in English that reported randomized controlled trails or prospective studies that involved adult human subjects with a chronic and/or disabling condition. All selected studies focused on some aspect of a wellness or health promotion intervention and involved a comparison or control group. Of the 5,847 studies initially identified in the search using medical subject heading terms, 190 met the criteria for full review. Data were extracted from these publications and summarized using descriptive statistics.Results: Almost all studies (95%) explored the effects of wellness intervention in a sample diagnosed with a single condition (e.g., cancer, stroke, arthritis). Although the mean sample size was 100, the range in sample size varied widely (6-688); 25% of the studies had sample of 30 or fewer. Almost all studies (89.5%) reported positive effects of the wellness intervention, although the delivery and content of interventions as well as the measurement of outcomes, varied greatly.Conclusions: Our findings support an immediate post-intervention positive impact of wellness interventions across persons with a wide variety of chronic and disabling conditions. Future research that clearly specifies primary study outcomes and follows the CONSORT guidelines will strengthen future reviews of the evidence and facilitate application of the evidence of practice.</description><dc:title>Benefits of wellness interventions for persons with chronic and disabling conditions: A review of the evidence</dc:title><dc:creator>Alexa K. Stuifbergen, Marian Morris, Jae Hak Jung, Diana Pierini, Stephanie Morgan</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.10.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-11</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-11</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Review Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage>133</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>145</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409000697/abstract?rss=yes"><title>An evaluation of health communication materials for individuals with disabilities developed by three state disability and health programs</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409000697/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: Health communication increasingly has been recognized as an important part of public health practice that can help raise awareness of potential health risks, influence attitudes and beliefs, and motivate individuals to change unhealthy behaviors. Yet, few health communication messages exist that target people with disabilities. An evaluation was conducted to assess the relevance and usefulness of health communication materials developed by or disseminated in, or both, three state disability and health programs.Methods: Health care providers and people with a variety of physical and sensory disabilities participated in the evaluation. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected in each of the three states using key informant interviews, focus groups, and a Web-based provider survey.Results: State program staff reported that health communication strategies and messages should be developed to improve access and remove barriers to health care, provide access to facilities, empower consumers, and educate health care providers about the needs of people with disabilities. Several of these needs are consistent with the needs identified by consumers in the focus groups. Consumers indicated that improvements to the overall content and design of the state-developed health communication materials are needed, yet health care and human service providers who participated in the Web-based survey were generally satisfied with the materials. Nearly all providers reported being aware of the materials; however, consumers were not familiar with the state-developed materials reviewed by the focus groups.Conclusions: Improvements in the content and dissemination of health promotion materials designed by states are indicated. Implications for public health practice, including recommendations for improving future health communication materials, are addressed in this article.</description><dc:title>An evaluation of health communication materials for individuals with disabilities developed by three state disability and health programs</dc:title><dc:creator>Pamela Williams-Piehota, Jennifer Uhrig, Julia Kish Doto, Wayne Anderson, Peyton Williams, JoAnn M. Thierry</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.08.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-11-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section><prism:startingPage>146</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>154</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001939/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Frequency of purchase and associated costs of assistive technology for Washington State Medicaid program enrollees with spina bifida by age</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001939/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: Assistive technology (AT) is one strategy to mitigate or eliminate barriers to independence for individuals with disabilities, including those with spina bifida (SB). However, little is known about current use and costs of AT for people with SB, including the cost burden to medical insurance payees.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate frequency of AT purchases and their associated costs for individuals with SB covered by the Washington State Medicaid program. Additionally, we sought to compare Medicaid reimbursement for AT to the overall Medicaid reimbursement for all medical care for these individuals.Methods: Data included all electronic claims and eligibility records of persons covered by the Medicaid program over a 4-year period (2001-2004) who had at least one service with a coded diagnosis of SB. Procedure codes were reviewed and grouped into the following AT categories: manual wheelchairs, powered wheelchairs, wheelchair cushions and seats, wheelchair accessories and repairs, wheelchair rental, ambulatory aids, orthotic and prosthetic devices, positioning aids, bathroom equipment, beds and bed accessories, and communication and hearing aids. Age group analyses were conducted after dividing patients into 3 age groups (0-15, 16-25, and 26+). Further subgroup analyses were done for individuals with dual or capitated medical coverage compared with those who had fee-for-service Medicaid-only coverage.Results: A total of 984 individuals with at least one diagnosis of SB during the 4-year study period were identified. On average, approximately one third of individuals made claims for some type of AT per year; the majority of these AT claims (87%) were for mobility-related AT. Average annual Medicaid cost of AT was $494 per enrollee and AT accounted for 3.3% of all Medicaid costs for these individuals. AT-related costs were highest for those aged 0-15 years and lowest for those aged 16-25 years. Persons with only fee-for-service Medicaid coverage had more than twice the annualized Medicaid AT-related expenditures compared to those with additional coverage or who were covered under a Medicaid capitation plan.Conclusions: Medicaid reimbursement for AT, as classified in this study, is a relatively low percentage of overall medical costs for individuals with SB. Because of the small percentage of non-mobility-related AT paid for in this study, we believe there may be a substantial unmet need for AT in this population and/or that individuals with SB may have significant AT-related out-of-pocket expenses. Given its large potential impact and relatively low cost burden to Medicaid, AT is a “good buy” and coverage for AT should be expanded.</description><dc:title>Frequency of purchase and associated costs of assistive technology for Washington State Medicaid program enrollees with spina bifida by age</dc:title><dc:creator>Alyssa M. Bamer, Frederick A. Connell, Brian J. Dudgeon, Kurt L. Johnson</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.10.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-28</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-28</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section><prism:startingPage>155</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>161</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001952/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Summative evaluation of a pilot aquatic exercise program for children with disabilities</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001952/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: Children with disabilities have lower physical activity levels and participate less in community-based sport and exercise programs than do children without disabilities. This in part is due to environmental barriers and lack of appropriate resources in these programs. Adaptive programs encouraging increased physical activity for children with disabilities are needed, and as these programs are developed, they should be critically evaluated.Purpose: The purposes of this article are to describe a pilot aquatic exercise program for children with disabilities, to evaluate the program, and to determine areas of strength and areas needing modifications.Methods: A summative program evaluation design was used to assess this twice per week aquatic exercise program lasting 14 weeks. Sixteen children, ages 6-12 years, with developmental disabilities participated in the program. Children swam laps, participated in relay races and water basketball games, and performed arm and leg strengthening exercises using aquatic noodles, foam barbells, and water for resistance. Swimming skills, program evaluation questionnaires, physical activity questionnaires, and interviews of pool site directors were used to determine program outcomes.Results: Findings suggest that children made improvements in their swimming skills, parents were satisfied with the program, and children increased their physical activity levels during the program and maintained the increased physical activity levels six months after the program ended. The program continued in some form after the 14-week intervention ended.Conclusions: The program was successful in achieving its objectives and recommendations for application of this program are provided.</description><dc:title>Summative evaluation of a pilot aquatic exercise program for children with disabilities</dc:title><dc:creator>Maria Fragala-Pinkham, Margaret E. O'Neil, Stephen M. Haley</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.11.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-08</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-08</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section><prism:startingPage>162</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>170</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001940/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Mood disorders and physical functioning difficulties as predictors of complex activity limitations in young U.S. adults</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001940/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: There is established research that shows associations between basic physical functional difficulties and complex activity limitations. In addition, there is some research that shows associations between mood disorders and complex activity limitations. However, there is limited research looking at the joint association between mood disorders and physical functioning and complex activity limitations. Furthermore, because mood disorders and physical functioning limitations increase with age, there is a lack of information available on younger adults.Objectives: We assess the impact of mood disorders and physical function difficulties as predictors of complex activity limitations in young U.S. adults, using data from a national survey.Methods: We use data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) among young U.S. adults 17 to 39 years of age. Selected basic actions difficulties include physical functioning difficulties (motor, visual, or hearing difficulties) and mood disorders (major depressive disorder, dysthymia, or bipolar disorder). Selected complex activity limitations include limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) (walking inside the home, standing from a chair, getting into and out of bed, eating, and dressing), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) (doing chores around the house, preparing meals, and managing money), and/or specific major life activities (limitations in the kind or amount of work or housework they could perform, or being limited in any way because of an impairment or health problem).Results: The prevalence of basic actions difficulty (physical functioning and/or mood disorder difficulties) among young adults is 34%. Among the young adults with basic actions difficulty, nearly 39% have mood disorders. The prevalence rates for ADL/IADL, major life activities, and any complex activity limitation are 8.6%, 8.1%, and 13.6%, respectively. Compared with young adults with no basic actions difficulties, the results showed that young adults with mood disorders alone had elevated adjusted odds ratios (2.5) for limitations in ADLs and/IADLs. For all the complex activity limitations analyzed, compared to those with no basic actions difficulties, young adults with physical functioning difficulties alone had substantially higher adjusted odds ratios (5.4-8.7) and young adults with comorbid mood disorder and physical functioning difficulties had the highest observed odds ratios (9.7-14.0).Conclusions: The data suggest a stronger risk of complex activity limitations when mood disorders coexist with physical functioning difficulties, leading to potential interference with a person's ability to accomplish the ADLs/IADLs or major life activities measured in this study. Given the magnitude of basic actions difficulty prevalence, and particularly the substantial contribution of mood disorders to this prevalence, further examination of the mental health component of basic actions difficulty is warranted. A possible area for future research could explore coordinated efforts to reduce physical and mental difficulties and facilitate the accomplishment of complex activities.</description><dc:title>Mood disorders and physical functioning difficulties as predictors of complex activity limitations in young U.S. adults</dc:title><dc:creator>Bruce S. Jonas, Mitchell Loeb</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.11.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-08</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-08</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section><prism:startingPage>171</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>178</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001885/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Quality of diabetes care for adults with developmental disabilities</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001885/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: Given that individuals with developmental disabilities have a history of difficulty accessing appropriate health care, possess numerous risk factors for diabetes, and frequently have unique needs within the health care setting, it is important to conduct surveillance research to determine the quality of their diabetes care.Objective/Hypothesis: We assessed the quality of diabetes care for adults with developmental disabilities enrolled in Kansas Medicaid. Developmental disability was defined in accordance with Kansas Medicaid program eligibility and included individuals with intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, autism, and/or seizure disorder.Methods: We identified a retrospective cohort of persons with developmental disabilities who were also diabetic and continuously enrolled in Kansas Medicaid. We tracked their quality of care measures (HbA1c/glucose testing, cholesterol testing, eye examinations, microalbuminaria screening, and primary care visits) across the subsequent 12 months. Quality care measures were evaluated in relation to basic demographic variables and comorbid hypertension using unconditional logistic regression.Results: Among 5,960 adults with developmental disability, 666 had diabetes (11.2%). Annual testing rates were HbA1c/glucose testing, 51.7%; cholesterol, 44.3%; eye examinations, 29.3%; and microalbuminaria, 18.5%. Nearly all (93.5%) had contact with a primary care provider during the period. Comorbid hypertension was associated with higher rates of HbA1c, cholesterol testing, and primary care visits. Dual eligibility was associated with lower HbA1c/glucose testing and cholesterol testing rates but comparable rates for other measures. Caucasians were more likely to have had an eye examination but less likely to have had their microalbumin checked.Conclusions: Adults with developmental disabilities and diabetes who were enrolled in the Kansas Medicaid Program were screened at lower frequency than published national figures for key quality indicators of diabetes care. These results call for action to find approaches to improve their quality of care. Further work is needed to understand the barriers to appropriate care and incentives that will remedy these gaps. In addition, research is needed to determine the accuracy of diabetes identification, treatment, and monitoring of adults with developmental disabilities.</description><dc:title>Quality of diabetes care for adults with developmental disabilities</dc:title><dc:creator>Theresa I. Shireman, Amanda Reichard, Niaman Nazir, James M. Backes, K. Allen Greiner</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.10.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-11</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-11</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section><prism:startingPage>179</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>185</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001927/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Changes in autism spectrum disorder prevalence in 4 areas of the United States</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001927/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: We sought to describe autism spectrum disorder (ASD) population characteristics and changes in identified prevalence across 3 time periods.Methods: Children with a potential ASD were identified through records abstraction at multiple sources with clinician review based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. Multisite, population-based data from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network were analyzed from areas of Arizona (AZ), Georgia (GA), Maryland (MD), and South Carolina (SC). Participants were 8-year-old children (born in 1992, 1994, or 1996) in 2000, 2002, or 2004 (and children born in 1988 residing in metropolitan Atlanta in 1996) who had been evaluated for a variety of developmental concerns at education and/or health sources.Results: From 2000 to 2004, the identified prevalence of the ASDs per 1,000 8-year-old children showed significant increases of 38% in GA and 72% in MD and a nonsignificant increase of 26% in AZ. ASD prevalence was relatively stable in SC with a nonsignificant decrease of 17%. Males had a higher identified prevalence of ASD in all years. Increases among racial, ethnic, and cognitive functioning subgroups varied by site and surveillance year. More children were classified with an ASD by community professionals over time, except in AZ.Conclusions: There was a trend toward increase in identified ASD prevalence among 8-year-old children who met the surveillance case definition in 3 of the 4 study sites from 2000 to 2004. Some of the observed increases are due to improved ascertainment; however, a true increase in ASD symptoms cannot be ruled out. These data confirm that the prevalence of ASDs is undergoing significant change in some areas of the United States and that ASDs continue to be of urgent public health concern.</description><dc:title>Changes in autism spectrum disorder prevalence in 4 areas of the United States</dc:title><dc:creator>Catherine Rice, Joyce Nicholas, Jon Baio, Sydney Pettygrove, Li-Ching Lee, Kim Van Naarden Braun, Nancy Doernberg, Chris Cunniff, Craig Newschaffer, F. John Meaney, Jane Charles, Anita Washington, Lydia King, Maria Kolotos, Kristen Mancilla, Cynthia A. Mervis, Laura Carpenter, Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.10.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-04</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-04</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section><prism:startingPage>186</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>201</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409002118/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Risk for cognitive deficit in a population-based sample of U.S. children with autism spectrum disorders: Variation by perinatal health factors</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409002118/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: From 30% to 60% of children with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have an IQ measure that falls in the intellectual disability (ID) range. It is not well studied whether, for children within this ASD subgroup, there is variation in the risk for low IQ based on a child's perinatal risk factors.Objective/Hypotheses: We assessed whether preterm delivery and term small-for-gestational-age (tSGA) were associated with various measures of cognitive deficit among children with ASDs.Methods: A sample of 1129 singleton children born in 1994 and identified through school and health record review as having an ASD by age 8 years were selected from a U.S. population-based surveillance network. Mean IQ and dichotomous IQ outcomes indicating various levels of ID were examined according to whether a child was preterm (&lt;37 weeks' gestation) or tSGA (term delivery and birth weight &lt;10th percentile for gestational age of a U.S. referent). Results for the total sample and within race-ethnicity/maternal education strata were adjusted for child sex and ASD subtype classification.Results: Mean IQ was significantly (p &lt; .05) lower in children delivered preterm (69.5) than term (74.5) and tSGA (69.3) than term appropriate-for gestational age (75.3). In stratified analyses, the preterm-IQ association was significant only among non-Hispanic white (NHW) children with maternal education at birth of high school or less; adjusted mean IQ was 8 points lower among those delivered preterm (65.4) than term (73.8). Term-SGA was associated with a significant 8-point deficit in adjusted mean IQ (75.5 vs. 83.8) in NHW children with maternal education greater than high school and a 6-point deficit that approached significance (68.4 vs. 74.5, p=0.10) in NHW children with maternal education of high school or less. Non-Hispanic black children in both maternal education groups had significantly lower mean IQs than NHW children with little variation by preterm or tSGA.Conclusions: In children with ASDs, the risk for concurrent ID or IQ deficit is associated with both preterm delivery and tSGA; these associations may vary by race-ethnicity and SES. Further studies of ASD-ID co-occurrence and the effectiveness of intervention strategies should consider both perinatal and sociodemographic factors.</description><dc:title>Risk for cognitive deficit in a population-based sample of U.S. children with autism spectrum disorders: Variation by perinatal health factors</dc:title><dc:creator>Laura A. Schieve, Jon Baio, Catherine E. Rice, Maureen Durkin, Russell S. Kirby, Carolyn Drews-Botsch, Lisa A. Miller, Joyce S. Nicholas, Christopher M. Cunniff</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.12.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section><prism:startingPage>202</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>212</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001897/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Modeling caregivers' perceptions of children's need for formal care: Physical function, intellectual disability, and behavior</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657409001897/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: Like most caregivers, informal caregivers for children (typically parents) with special needs supply the majority of the care provided. Formal care is sometimes needed to supplement informal caregivers' efforts. For those interested in children with special needs, there is a paucity of research on those factors affecting the amount of formal care that caregivers' request.Objectives/Hypotheses: This research investigates factors affecting the amount of Medicaid personal care services (PCS) requested by primary caregivers for children with special needs. The research focuses especially on the roles played by the child's functional status, intellectual abilities, and behaviors in determining the level of assistance requested by caregivers.Methods: The data used in this research are cross-sectional information on 262 children with special needs who were Medicaid recipients in a single southwestern state. These data were collected in 2007 by master's trained social workers or registered nurses using a standardized assessment instrument.Results: The results indicate that a child's ability to independently perform activities of daily living (ADLs) tasks plays the major role in determining caregivers' perceptions of the need for PCS. The severity of a child's intellectual disability, like some other factors investigated, has an effect on caregivers' perceptions, but it is an indirect effect that operates through the level of the child's ADL impairment. A child's age and behaviors have direct effects on caregivers' perceptions of need, as does the presence of barriers to the caregiver providing care.Discussion: Much of the research on children with special needs has emphasized the importance of the child's medical or behavioral diagnoses. Little attention has been given to modeling caregivers' perceptions of children's needs. This analysis of caregivers' requests for formal PCS brings to the forefront the role of ADL or functional status in this process. Many factors that one would expect to directly affect caregivers' perceptions of need, instead, have indirect effects filtered through their impact on the child's functional status.</description><dc:title>Modeling caregivers' perceptions of children's need for formal care: Physical function, intellectual disability, and behavior</dc:title><dc:creator>Constance J. Fournier, Matthew J. Davis, Ashweeta Patnaik, Timothy R. Elliott, James A. Dyer, Emily E. Jasek, Charles D. Phillips</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.10.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-28</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-28</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section><prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>221</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000026/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Stroke in young adults</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000026/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: Stroke among young adults is generally considered a rare event, although few studies have considered national data.Objective: The objective of this paper was to profile stroke in young adults in the United States using a national dataset.Methods: Data from the 2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were examined to estimate the number of patients, mean length of stay, mean costs, and discharge disposition of young adults (aged 18-44 y) with a diagnosis of stroke.Results: Estimates indicate that 41,587 (or 4.9%) of individuals experiencing a stroke in 2007 were young adults: 32,438 had an ischemic stroke, 4662 had a subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 4487 had an intracerebral hemorrhage. The average length of stay was 4.7 days for ischemic stroke, 11.6 days for subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 11.2 days for intracerebral hemorrhage. Approximately 5% (2013) of young adults died of stroke. Most young adults were discharged routinely to home at an average cost associated with their hospital stay of $34,886 for ischemic stroke, $146,307 for subarachnoid hemorrhage, and $94,482 for intracerebral hemorrhage.Conclusions: A substantial number of young adults experience stroke in the United States at costs that are higher than those for stroke patients overall.</description><dc:title>Stroke in young adults</dc:title><dc:creator>Charles Ellis</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.01.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Brief Report</prism:section><prism:startingPage>222</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>224</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000403/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Editorial Board</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000403/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Editorial Board</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1936-6574(10)00040-3</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000415/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Aims and Scope</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000415/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Aims and Scope</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1936-6574(10)00041-5</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000427/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Table of Contents</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000427/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Table of Contents</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1936-6574(10)00042-7</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A3</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A3</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000439/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Author Information</title><link>http://www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com/article/PIIS1936657410000439/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Author Information</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1936-6574(10)00043-9</dc:identifier><dc:source>Disability and Health Journal 3, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Disability and Health Journal</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>3</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1936-6574(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A4</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A5</prism:endingPage></item></rdf:RDF>